’70 Challenger Power And Handling

Tech Question


Andrew Yeo, West Lafayette, IN, 1970 Dodge Challenger 318

Rick, I’m working on a 1970 Challenger “Western Special”
that will be set up for handling and need to choose an engine. I like bigblock power and torque but I’m concerned about balance and handling. Can Iset the car up to get good handling with a “light” big block (451, aluminumheads, aluminum radiator, battery in trunk) or do I need to drop back to asmall block? The chassis has been stiffened (frame connectors & torqueboxes by Auto Rust Technicians) and I expect to replace torsion bars andsway bars with stiffer pieces. Your advice would be very much appreciated.


Amdrew, the short answer is : “yes”. But, like many things in life, thisreally isn’t a “yes/no” question, but a matter of degrees.

For handling, braking, accelleration, and even fuel economy and drivetraindurability — virtually every performance parameter save terminalvelocity — mass is your enemy. Less mass means you need “less” brakes -which are lighter – reducing mass! Etcetera. For handling, removing,especially, mass at the ends of the car is very rewarding — that ol’ “polarmoment of inertia” thing at work.

No question, you can remove mass from a big-block car. Beyond theengine-related things you’ve mentioned, there’s fiberglass body panels,polycarbonate “glass”, etc. With some effort and attention to detail, youcould probably get a streetable big-block E-body down to 3200 pounds or so.But, you could also reduce that number by easily another 100+ pounds – allfrom the nose – by going small block. And, with a 408-inch smallblock and,say, Indy’s aluminum W-2 style heads, you could easily make 500+ HP.

So, like so many of these personal-decision type questions, all I can do islay out the facts as I see them — once you have all of ’em, the finalchoice is yours.


Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More