Manifold and Carb for 360/408 Stroker

Tech Question


Greg Clark, Newark, CA, 85 Dodge B250 van 318/408

I am a regular “Grocery Store” subscriber to your greatmagazine and have learned a great deal from all of the tech articles.Please keep them coming hot and heavy!!

I am in the process of upgrading the power plant in my faithful ’85 3182bbl Dodge van. At 180,000 trouble free miles, the motor is really showingits age.

I am building a 360/408 stroker for it but am in Smog Nazi heaven -California, so I must pass smog tests and look stock. I have no fantasythat this lead sled will do 9 sec. quarter miles. In fact I am only lookingto use this as a 100% daily driven street machine. Budget issues apply ofcourse.

The new mill is about ready to go back together and is bored .030 andusing a Mopar stroker crank with Keith Black 356 9:1 pistons with Speed Promoly rings. I am using a mild generic Summit cam with the recommended Cranesprings and no exhaust valve rotators.

My questions are two –

1. How good is the stock 4bbl manifold – casting # 4173915. Can I port it abit and get good use out of it?

2. What carb is “Appropriate” for an ’85 360 van per smog visualinspection. The local Mopar dealer’s parts catalog says a TQ. The MotorAuto Tuneup and Electrical book for 1985 says a QJ.?? I have 2 rebuildableTQ carbs.

I am trying to really play the smog game here and don’t plan to repaintthe valve covers or the manifold (if I use it) so as to not scream out “Newplayed with engine here”.

Your advice is appreciated and respected!



Your plan sounds well thought-out. The stock iron manifold is perfectly OK,in fact, for your usage, there’s not much better. Porting, however, beyondobvious casting-flash cleanup, is probably a waste of time.

As I recall, 1985 was the changeover year from T-Qs to Q-Js. EITHER iscorrect, unless they want to get into build dates, etc. If I had my choice,I’d use the T-Q in a New York Minute. (Big surprise, right?)

One tip on emissions: if you have a choice of several cams, pick the onewith greatest lobe separation.


Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More