Tech Questionjohn shoe, Murrieta, CA, 1975 dodge dart sport 360 Rick- I've not so much of a question , as much as rhetoric; an inquiry about Chrysler's excellent (in my opinion ) rear suspension / drivetrain from the golden years (1989 & earlier ) of rear wheel drive. I've seen and heard too many times in the last 2-3 years where someone -- typically a customiser -- will replace the superb leafspring / forward-of-centre axle mounting suspension , in favour of a 4 link setup ; I won't delve into the whole rack & pinion butchery of the front end ... What I'm after here is your expert opinion regarding the OEM rear suspension vs. the neuveaux multi-link / 4 link rear suspension systems. I'd truly like to see your opine in print , as you've presented some excellent articles on front end mods (which I'll be applying to my '75 360 Dart Sport really soon here ... ). It seems like about 15 - 20 years since you've tech'd a rear suspension dial-in (or I've just been that much out of the loop!). Thank you much for your time and all due consideration! Sincerely, Shoe John- The 4-link rear suspension swap isn't nearly as bad as the tubular K-member / coil spring front deal. The key is that it has gotta be done right, and properly attached to the chassis, and some kind of lateral location system installed, preferably a Watts link, or, at least, a Panhard rod. With the modern CAD programs, a skilled user (and fabricator) could probably whip up something good. However, generally, the unsprung weight savings, if any, are small, and the geometry improvement also small if done right; if done wrong there can be significant rear-steer problems. At that point, however, I think I'd start thinking about a sea change: IRS. If lightweight fiberglass or composite leafs could be found with 100,000 mile durability and a reliable front attachment system that could handle high axle torque, that would sure be the way to go. One's thing's sure: The Chrysler asymmetrical rear leaf suspension was a lot
more sophisticated than it appeared at first blush. Dialing it in is pretty
simple, a condensed version: Rick
|
Main Index | Current Issue | Tech Q & A | Tech Archive | Subscription | Advertisers Links | Contact Info